Assignment Rubric 1 Criteriaratings Bus 195 Acade

Assignment Rubric 1 Criteriaratings Bus 195 Acade

Assignment Rubric 1 Criteriaratings Bus 195 Acade

Visit and review the websites for three to five major credit counseling
services, including the National Foundation for Consumer Credit (www.nfcc.org). What
services are provided? How are they provided, in person, by telephone, by the Internet? What
costs, if any, are involved? What information is available to help someone with credit
problems? Choose the service they would use. What factors affected your
choice?

Also, include from your perspective after all your research how do you build and maintain good credit?

The student should be 2-3 pages in length (title page and reference page do not count toward the written pages. The paper should be in APA format.

Make sure you cite references from where you find this info to support your thoughts and opinions you provide.

Take time to review the video and as well the article that is supplied for this assignment.

Link to article.

Link (Links to an external site.)

View video below

Assignment Rubric 1

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Assignment Rubric 1

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeets Expectation _2554Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >27.0 pts

Full Marks

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

27.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_555

Edit ratingDelete rating

24.0 to >21.0 pts

Below expectations

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_3796

Edit ratingDelete rating

21.0 to >0 pts

Limited evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent _1657

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >22.5 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

_3490

Edit ratingDelete rating

22.5 to >15.0 pts

Approaches expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

_6473

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >7.5 pts

Below expectations

Major errors or omissions in the demonstration of knowledge.

_9620

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.5 to >0.0 pts

Limited evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

_6690

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

No Marks

_6482

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. _8138

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >15.0 pts

Meets expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

_1921

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >7.5 pts

Approaches expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

_1239

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.5 to >4.5 pts

Below Expectation

The project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

_1786

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.5 to >0.0 pts

Limited evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

_8436

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

No Marks

_3508

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style _3627

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Meets expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

_311

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Approaches expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

_2618

Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 to >3.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

_8224

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

_3118

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

No Marks

_6687

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 20.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis _3794

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the topic.

_981

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >10.0 pts

Approaches expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

_6994

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >5.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

_4537

Edit ratingDelete rating

5.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

_7968

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

No Marks

_5208

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 40.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

threshold: 5 pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

5to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

0to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

Additional Comments

Total Points: 150.0