Meaningful Criminal Justice Reform Sdsu Police Ki

Meaningful Criminal Justice Reform Sdsu Police Ki

Meaningful Criminal Justice Reform Sdsu Police Ki

Make sure to read directions very clearly. I will give the course materials once a tutor is selected

In Spring 2020, communities across the United States witnessed protests in the wake of the death of George Floyd
and Breonna Taylor. Calls for police reform became prevalent in the media, on yard signs in urban and suburban
areas, in commercials and, of course, in political discourse. This assignment is an opportunity for students to draw
upon what you have learned about policing models, strategies, unions, legal regulations and liability, and
organizational change to address calls for police reform.

PAGE LIMIT: 5 pages, exclusive of Title page and Works Cited page

TECHNICAL: Double-spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins

**Assignment Description: In Breaking Rank, Norm Stamper suggests that meaningful criminal justice reform cannot
occur “without significant structural transformation” of local police departments. Your paper will develop an
argument either in support of or against Stamper’s position. You will be graded based on how persuasively you
argue your position. You are expected to draw upon both (i) course materials (i.e., the textbook, Stamper’s book
and material posted on Canvas), and (ii) your independent research (including news articles, academic books and
peer-reviewed articles). You should cite at least three sources (other than required course material). Your paper
should address at least one counterargument to your thesis. An effective introduction and conclusions are also
necessary.

EXCERPT from Chapter 16 (“Demilitarizing the Police”) of Norm Stamper’s book, Breaking Rank:


“Many Americans view their local PD as an occupational force—repressive, distant, arrogant. It’s
no wonder: their police department operates within the framework of a paramilitary
bureaucracy, a structure that fortifies that image and promotes the behavior. Your local PD
takes raw material, the average police recruit from your own community, and molds him or her
into a soldier-bureaucrat, starting in the academy.

That rigid, top-down, highly centralized, militarily oriented “command and control” system
simply does not work for policing – not in America, not in our multicultural, ostensibly, pluralistic,
democratic society. The paramilitary bureaucracy, or “PMB”, as I’ve referred to it in my notes
over the years, is a slow-footed, buck-passing, blame-laying, bullying, bigotry-fostering
institutional arrangement, as constipated by tradition and as resistant to change as Mel Gibson’s
version of the Catholic Church. I cannot imagine other essential reforms in policing – improved
crime-fighting, safety and morale of the force, the honoring of constitutional guarantees—
without significant structural transformation.”

TECHNICAL ASPECTS: Your paper must be submitted online via Turnitin. It must be typed with 12-point font, and
double-spaced. Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure. The paper must be written
using the OWL Resource MLA formatting style guide (AVAILABLE ONLINE). The paper must not exceed five pages
(exclusive of the Work Cited page and Cover Page). The cover page must list your name, paper title, instructor’s
name, and date of submission. The “Works Cited” must list all sources used.

GRADING: Your paper will be graded using the following rubric:
Introductory Paragraph (10 points): The introduction should provide (i) factual and theoretical context for
your paper, (ii) set forth your thesis, and (iii) provide a roadmap of your argument.

Well-Crafter Thesis (20 points): Your thesis should clearly present your argument to the reader. You will
lose points if the position you are taking is unclear.

Two Argument Supporting Thesis (60 points): Your paper should feature two arguments that clearly and
logically support your thesis. Your argument should draw on evidence (e.g., statistics, interviews, research
articles, etc.) to persuade the reader of your position.

Counterargument (20 points): Your paper should identify and refute a counterargument. Maximum points
will be awarded to the articulation and refutation of strong counterarguments based on evidence (as
opposed to hypothetical arguments, strawmen or indefensibly extreme views).

Quality of Research (50 points): You must draw upon (i) course materials and (ii) your own independent
research. At a minimum, you must cite three quality sources in addition to the textbook, Stamper’s book
or any material posted on Canvas. Peer-reviewed research articles offer the highest quality because the
data is reviewed by specialists in the field. Additional quality sources include academic books, articles
from credible news sources (such as major newspapers and news magazines), statistics from
governmental sites, and published judicial opinions. Lectures/lecture slides are considered an informal
source that you should avoid. Wikipedia is not a quality source. Each chapter in your textbook has a list of
sources/citations that can aid in your research.

Conclusion (10 points): Your conclusion should synthesize the thoughts raised in the body of your paper
and offer your final thoughts on the subject.

Correct Grammar, Spelling and MLA Formatting (20 points): Your paper must contain correct spelling and
grammar and utilize MLA formatting. For each error, one point will be deducted. Use an academic tone
(avoid slang and contractions).

Works Cited Page (10 points): The works cited page must list every resource that you used to develop
your paper